Few words in the IT and telecoms channel are used as often — or as loosely — as IoT.
It appears on every roadmap and product sheet, yet its meaning shifts depending on who you ask.
For some, it’s a sensor network.
For others, a router estate.
And for many, IoT is simply shorthand for selling SIMs.
That confusion isn’t new; it’s how the channel first entered the IoT market — through the part it could own first: connectivity.
But as cellular IoT connectivity took off, its meaning split in two directions.
One way, it was overstated as “IoT” — used to brand business continuity services like backup and pre-ethernet, or stretched loosely enough to suggest full, end-to-end solutions.
The other, it was downplayed as “mobile data” — framed as just another form of consumer connectivity, even when it was enabling IoT devices, systems, and orchestration.
Both took off for the same reason: they made cellular IoT connectivity easier to sell.
But the dual misrepresentation now distorts what it really is — and where partners create value.
Cellular IoT is neither IoT on its own (a SIM alone doesn’t define IoT any more than a cable defines a fixed line) nor a rebrand of mobile data.
But how partners frame it next will decide where their growth comes from.
The shift didn’t happen by accident. It’s how the channel naturally evolves: adapt fast, fill gaps, and monetise what’s tangible first.
When IoT first entered the conversation, it came wrapped in visions of smart cities, predictive analytics, and industrial transformation — ambitions that sat far outside most resellers’ reach.
Back then, most of the market still called it M2M — machine-to-machine — long before the broader “IoT” label took hold. And early adoption wasn’t glamorous; it came through practical use cases like fleet tracking.
Resellers couldn’t suddenly build the sensors, platforms, or analytics needed for IoT, but they could extend what they already knew: delivering the connectivity piece.
Cellular IoT connectivity became the natural starting point — SIMs, data plans, and managed services that fit existing systems and billing models.
It was the simplest, most scalable way to “do IoT” without re-engineering the whole business.
So IoT entered the channel through connectivity: the layer resellers could touch, sell, and control.
But gradually, IoT in the channel began to mean that layer.
From the start, the distinction between business connectivity and IoT connectivity was hazy.
The same cellular IoT stack — multi-network SIMs, private APNs, pooled data — could serve a 4G backup router as easily as a fleet of smart meters.
Operationally, the overlap makes sense. Linguistically, it caused chaos.
Without clearly defined boundaries, it blurred what each offer was really selling: resilience on one side, enabled insight and control on the other.
This is really where the dual identity began.
Marketing made the blurring worse.
As the market for cellular IoT expanded, network operators and aggregators wanted to make a complex technology easier to sell — especially for resellers used to broadband and mobile.
So they dropped words like “cellular” and “IoT” altogether, and borrowed from “mobile data” instead: smart mobile, intelligent data, managed 4G.
It sounded modern yet familiar, bridging the gap between mobile and IoT without needing to explain the ins and outs.
But the trade-off was precision.
In simplifying cellular IoT connectivity to sound like mobile, the market blurred the line between consumer-style connectivity and managed, solution-fit infrastructure — making it easier to sell in the short term, but harder to differentiate in the long term.
Sales teams found themselves spending more time explaining what it wasn’t than what it was.
The simplification helped adoption but hollowed out meaning — turning cellular IoT connectivity into “just another data SIM,” when in reality it’s business-grade infrastructure built for resilience, orchestration, and control.
While vendors simplified terminology downward, resellers were repurposing the same technology upward.
As fixed-line margins shrank, 2G and 3G networks began sunsetting, and fibre installs lagged, customers needed connectivity that could launch instantly and flex across sites.
So smart resellers took the same cellular IoT technology that powered IoT devices and used it to solve very real infrastructure challenges — backup, pre-ethernet, rapid deployment.
Many branded these propositions under the IoT banner: it sounded future-ready, even if the offer was more about business continuity than IoT solutions.
That mismatch stuck. But for many buyers, “IoT” usually means an end-to-end partner: hardware, platforms, analytics — the works.
So when cellular backup is presented as an IoT solution, or within its vicinity, expectations diverge fast. Customers expect transformation; they’re getting continuity.
One delivers outcomes, the other uptime — but if they share the same label, everyone ends up negotiating price instead of fit.
All this stems from one simple reality: The same cellular IoT technology serves two very different purposes.
Both rely on the same foundation, but one sells resilience; the other enables intelligence.
And when both are called “IoT,” the value story and revenue strategy collapses into one.
With 2G and 3G sunsetting, LPWAN networks expanding, and enterprises demanding end-to-end visibility, precision in how we describe and deliver cellular IoT connectivity has never mattered more.
When partners separate business connectivity, IoT connectivity, and IoT solutions, everything gets sharper:
Clarity isn’t just linguistic — it’s commercial. Each layer carries different margins, risks, and routes to market.
When language blurs them, so do go-to-market strategies.
But when each layer is priced, marketed, and supported correctly, partners compete on value — not volume — and protect their margins as the market matures.
This clarity reveals the real structure of the market — and three natural growth paths, all powered by the same cellular IoT connectivity backbone the channel already owns.
1. Start with business connectivity
Solve uptime challenges: launch operations quickly or add failover to fixed lines.
Here you’re leveraging the core strengths of cellular IoT connectivity — speed to deploy and resilience — to complement what you already do well, without blurring it with unnecessary IoT terminology and overpromising.
2. Expand into IoT connectivity
Embed SIMs into existing devices, manage data transport, and deliver orchestration.
Here it's wise to focus on your current buyers in IT and Operations, and connect devices in their remit — ones they'd view as a natural extension of business connectivity, but may be running on unfit connectivity — consumer SIMs or fixed-lines. They'll often be running into problems only cellular IoT connectivity can solve.
It’s scalable, profitable, and within operational reach — where you can build recurring revenue and differentiate from consumer mobile offerings through control, not volume.
3. Scale into IoT solutions
Combine devices, platforms, and analytics into managed IoT solutions that deliver long-term account value and deeper customer integration.
In all three routes, cellular IoT connectivity is the backbone — not the definition of IoT, and not something to be sold as mobile.
And partners who position, push, and pull that foundation clearly for its context will stop selling buzzwords and start building real value: resilience, intelligence, and control.
For most resellers who are getting started, cellular doesn't sit in a new “IoT” category — it belongs right where you already win: connectivity.
Connectivity
Think of it as two simple extensions of what you already sell:
Both layers use the same cellular IoT backbone — you’re just applying it in different places:
You don’t need to rebrand it as “IoT” or “smart data.”
Just call it what it is: business-grade cellular connectivity — the same technology that powers IoT systems, made simple and visible for IT.
_white.svg)
